From xemacs-m  Sun Jan  5 16:53:51 1997
Received: from atreides.mindspring.com (qmailr@atreides.mindspring.com [204.180.142.236])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id QAA13109 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 16:53:50 -0600 (CST)
Received: (qmail 22725 invoked by uid 52477); 5 Jan 1997 22:53:51 -0000
Sender: sj@atreides.mindspring.com
To: XEmacs beta <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: lazy-lock 1.15 fixes
References: <yviasp4fu6hg.fsf@atreides.mindspring.com> <m2afqnvipu.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Sudish Joseph <sudish@mindspring.com>
Date: 05 Jan 1997 17:53:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 05 Jan 1997 14:51:41 -0800
Message-ID: <yviapvzju41s.fsf@atreides.mindspring.com>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.78/XEmacs 20.0

Steven L Baur writes:
> (I'm rejecting this patch for the moment, although I think you're on
> the right track).

I'm not sure what you mean by this.  Lazy lock 1.15 is working for me
with that patch in 20.0-b34.

> Did you examine all the places where mistaken version identity tests
> are made?

Well, no.  Just the ones that redefine internal functions to cope with
19.11 lossage and breaks under 20.x  The rest seem to be user-definable
settings.

-Sudish

