From xemacs-m  Wed Jun 11 18:06:43 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA09363;
	Wed, 11 Jun 1997 18:06:43 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id QAA06404; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 16:26:25 -0700
Received: from kindra.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id QAA12131; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 16:05:07 -0700
Received: from xemacs.eng.sun.com by kindra.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA22689; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 16:05:04 -0700
Received: by xemacs.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA18769; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 16:05:01 -0700
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 16:05:01 -0700
Message-Id: <199706112305.QAA18769@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: xpm version configure test
In-Reply-To: <m2bu5d6l8r.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199706111254.FAA16587@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
	<m2bu5d6l8r.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 20.3 "Zagreb" XEmacs Lucid (beta5)
Reply-To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>

>>>>> "sb" == Steven L Baur <Steven> writes:

sb> Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM> writes:
>> I intend to use the following test to check that our Xpm version is
>> sufficiently up to date.  Can someone with an SGI check that the
>> broken Xpm installed on that system does in fact fail this test??
>> If it passes, what exactly is wrong with SGI's xpm?

>> #include <xpm.h>
>> #if XpmIncludeVersion < 30406
>> #error Xpm version too old
>> #endif

sb> That's cutting it close.  30406 is the version I'm using and it works
sb> fine.

Maybe the reason you're running 30406 is that it's the first one that
actually worked.

Martin

