From xemacs-m  Wed Jun 11 13:35:25 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA19853
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 13:35:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA14566;
	Wed, 11 Jun 1997 11:35:32 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: xpm version configure test
References: <199706111254.FAA16587@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Martin Buchholz's message of "Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:54:41 -0700"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 11 Jun 1997 11:35:32 -0700
Message-ID: <m2bu5d6l8r.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.56/XEmacs 20.3(beta6) - "Moscow"

Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM> writes:

> I intend to use the following test to check that our Xpm version is
> sufficiently up to date.  Can someone with an SGI check that the
> broken Xpm installed on that system does in fact fail this test??
> If it passes, what exactly is wrong with SGI's xpm?

> #include <xpm.h>
> #if XpmIncludeVersion < 30406
> #error Xpm version too old
> #endif

That's cutting it close.  30406 is the version I'm using and it works
fine.
-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

