From xemacs-m  Mon Jun  9 19:23:04 1997
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA12128
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 19:23:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from M66-080-9.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA13564; Mon, 9 Jun 97 20:05:50 EDT
Received: by m66-080-9.MIT.EDU (5.x/4.7) id AA13827; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 20:05:48 -0400
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 1997 20:05:48 -0400
Message-Id: <9706100005.AA13827@m66-080-9.MIT.EDU>
From: David Bakhash <cadet@MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: event-closest-point fixed
X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid

hey,
	Kyle, thanks a lot for fixing that.  That really will make
strokes a bit more appealing, that it not botch up stuff.  I actually
noticed something interesting about event-closest-point in XEmacs
19.15.  It's that I brought down 19.15 at work (Sun Sparc running
Solaris) and at home (Linux) and it did two different things.  When I
went to the right/left of the frame, but outside it, both versions acted 
identically, but when I went *below* the frame, the Linux version just
ignored the pointer position and the Solaris version returned an error.
It was weird. but I'm glad to hear that someone actually cared enough to 
fix it.  THANKS!

dave

