From xemacs-m  Sat Jun  7 03:07:14 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA24577
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 03:07:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id KAA10334; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 10:07:06 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Build success: Linux
References: <199706070705.AAA32735@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 07 Jun 1997 10:07:06 +0200
In-Reply-To: "Karl M. Hegbloom"'s message of Sat, 7 Jun 1997 00:05:25 -0700
Message-ID: <kigenaen8et.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.3(beta4)

"Karl M. Hegbloom" <karlheg@inetarena.com> writes:

>  `gnuattach` said that it cannot find libcanna.so, which I don't
> have.  Shouldn't it not need that unless I compile '--with-mule'?

Huh?  `gnuattach' shouldn't be shipped with XEmacs at all.  It must
have left over from an old version.

What does `gnuclient -nw' say?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Good pings come in small packets.

