From xemacs-m  Fri Jun  6 23:44:06 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA21563
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 23:44:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id WAA17303; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 22:02:40 -0700
Received: from kindra.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id VAA23375; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 21:42:42 -0700
Received: from xemacs.eng.sun.com by kindra.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id VAA07055; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 21:42:39 -0700
Received: by xemacs.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id VAA12336; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 21:42:37 -0700
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 21:42:37 -0700
Message-Id: <199706070442.VAA12336@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: 20.3b4 hpux9.05 success
In-Reply-To: <E0waAzc-0003Qh-00@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
References: <E0waAzc-0003Qh-00@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under 20.3 XEmacs Lucid (beta3)
Reply-To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>

>>>>> "Neal" == Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com> writes:

Neal> 20.3b4 patched OK.  db detect failed without
Neal> --site-includes=/usr/local/include/db.

Please confirm that the more natural
--site-includes=/usr/local/include also works correctly.

If it needed /usr/local/include to find db.h, shouldn't it also have
needed /usr/local/lib to find libdb.a?

Question for everyone:

Should XEmacs autodetect the presence of /usr/local/{include,lib}, and
use those without hints from the user?  If so, should they take
precedence over the "system" directories?

Martin

