From xemacs-m  Fri Jun  6 23:08:12 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA21350
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 23:08:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id GAA18155; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 06:08:11 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: 20.3b4 linux success (more or less)
References: <E0waCcL-0001bl-00@neptune.corp.comsat.com>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 07 Jun 1997 06:08:11 +0200
In-Reply-To: 's message of Fri, 6 Jun 1997 23:56:41 -0400
Message-ID: <kig67vrrr6c.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.3(beta4)

<neal@ctd.comsat.com> writes:

> 1.  WARNING - I tried patching up using patch-2.3, which I had just
>     built using the usual optimization settings.  It seems to just
>     patch one file and then exit!  I reinstalled patch-2.1 (which
>     won't build out of the box because it defines basename, which
>     conflicts with libc), then the patch went fine.  It looks to me
>     that patch-2.3 fails to meet the minimum requirements of a program 
>     that calls itself "patch".

What options have you used?

I remember that the syntax of some options has changed.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Then...  his face does a complete change of expression.  It goes from
a "Vengeance is mine" expression, to a "What the fuck" blank look.

