From xemacs-m  Thu Jun  5 06:08:24 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA06289
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 06:08:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id EAA23473; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 04:26:34 -0700
Received: from kindra.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id EAA27522; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 04:07:04 -0700
Received: from xemacs.eng.sun.com by kindra.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id EAA15861; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 04:07:04 -0700
Received: by xemacs.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id EAA09523; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 04:07:00 -0700
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 04:07:00 -0700
Message-Id: <199706051107.EAA09523@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: Takanori Saneto <sanewo@ba2.so-net.or.jp>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: b3 configure failure on FreeBSD-3.0 fix
In-Reply-To: <87enaj2t7y.fsf@sanewo.ba2.so-net.or.jp>
References: <199706010816.BAA06163@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
	<87enaj2t7y.fsf@sanewo.ba2.so-net.or.jp>
X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under 20.3 XEmacs Lucid (beta3)
Reply-To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>

>>>>> "Taka" == Takanori Saneto <sanewo@ba2.so-net.or.jp> writes:

Taka> BTW, why using `echo $var` construct at all? Why not just placing
Taka> variables there? To make the result of expansion look better? Who
Taka> cares? Or some other reason?

Fixed in beta 4 by abandoning echo as a mechanism.  Yes, I'm far too
much into esthetics, and I don't want my compile commands and
Makefiles to have random multiple blanks in them.  Programs are an art 
form, and should be beautiful.

Martin

