From xemacs-m  Mon Jun  2 22:38:35 1997
Received: from pentagana.sonic.jp (jhod@tc-6-113.tokyo.gol.com [203.216.8.113])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA12595
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 22:38:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from jhod@localhost) by pentagana.sonic.jp (8.7.1+2.6Wbeta4/3.4W3) id MAA00428; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 12:23:42 +0900
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [Marc Nozell <marc@nozell.com>] xpm bug in Gnus v5.4.56
References: <kigiuzwskoi.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> 	<QQcsgl18678.199706022346@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> 	<kig910ssgae.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <QQcsgo19345.199706030035@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> <kig3er0see3.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m2206ko303.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <kigoh9oqvqo.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
From: jhod@po.iijnet.or.jp (P. E. Jareth Hein)
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of 03 Jun 1997 04:13:35 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 03 Jun 1997 12:23:41 +0900
Message-ID: <u44tbggyiq.fsf@pentagana.sonic.jp>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.2

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:
> 
> > > Yes, I know.  What I dispute is the second case: when the feature is
> > > *not* present, I'd like it to *not* instantiate silently, instead of
> > > raising an error.
> > 
> > I agree.  This is something we should fix in 20.3.
> 
> Note that I tried to produce a patch, but failed.  Someone else,
> pleeease?  I don't understand that part of code. :-(
> 

Since I just implemented TIFFs, I'll take a stab at it...

--
Jareth

