From xemacs-m  Wed May 21 12:24:02 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA26949
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 21 May 1997 12:23:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA14243;
	Wed, 21 May 1997 10:24:43 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Byte-compiler hack: is it working?
References: <kig3erg4vu4.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of 21 May 1997 18:46:11 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 21 May 1997 10:24:41 -0700
Message-ID: <m2n2po68me.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.53/XEmacs 20.3(beta2)

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> XEmacs 20.3-b1 is supposed to include the byte-compiler improvement of 
> optimizing (+ foo 1) to (1+ foo).  However:

Oops, it doesn't.  After applying the patch I get:
(defun foo ()
  (+ x 1))
(byte-compile 'foo)

byte code for foo:
  args: nil
0	varref	  x
1	add1	  
2	return	  

-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

