From xemacs-m  Mon May 19 13:10:20 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA26026
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 19 May 1997 13:10:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcqfw21370; Mon, 19 May 1997 14:10:20 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 14:10:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQcqfw21370.199705191810@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [Success] 20.3-b1, Linux-2.0.30 (patched up from 20.2 final)
In-Reply-To: <m2enb3z7rk.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199705190329.MAA00629@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
	<m2enb3z7rk.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 20.3 XEmacs Lucid (beta1)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Steven L Baur writes:
 > Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp> writes:
 > 
 > > Usually I invoke xemacs w/ 'xemacs -geo 80x66+1280+1024'.
 > > This xemacs appears w/ six lines of mini buffer... (?_?)
 > > Is this behavior normal?
 > 
 > It probably is now.  The minibuffer is more easily resizable due to
 > Kyle's recent fixes of it (try dragging the bottom modeline :-).

A 6-line minibuffer is beyond what I would expect.  I don't see
that behavior here, but that doesn't mean much.

This could be another frame sizing anomaly.  Go to src/frame.c
and comment out the following code and see if the problem goes
away.

  /*
   * If the frame has been initialized and the new height and width
   * are the same as the current height and width, then just return.
   */
  if (f->init_finished &&
      newheight == FRAME_HEIGHT (f) && newwidth == FRAME_WIDTH (f))
    return;

