From xemacs-m  Fri May 16 12:12:26 1997
Received: from pallas.spacetec.no (pallas.spacetec.no [192.51.5.92])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA15047
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 16 May 1997 12:12:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from tor@localhost)
	by pallas.spacetec.no (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA05988
	for xemacs-beta@xemacs.org; Fri, 16 May 1997 19:12:28 +0200
Message-Id: <199705161712.TAA05988@pallas.spacetec.no>
From: tor@spacetec.no (Tor Arntsen)
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 19:12:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: Raymond Toy <toy@rtp.ericsson.se>
       "Wnn4 and Wnn6?  Re: 20.2 release is a go + Binary kit instructions" (May 16, 18:06)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Wnn4 and Wnn6?  Re: 20.2 release is a go + Binary kit instructions

On May 16, 18:06, Raymond Toy wrote:
>Is there a reason to pick Wnn4 over Wnn6 (or vice versa)?  Is a
>precompiled version of Wnn4 available?  

Hm, as far as I can see Wnn4 is freely available while Wnn6 is commercial -
at least it looked like that last I checked and then I can't use it here.

Tor

