From xemacs-m  Wed May 14 04:01:41 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA06443
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 14 May 1997 04:01:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id CAA20169; Wed, 14 May 1997 02:14:40 -0700
Received: from kindra.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id CAA00523; Wed, 14 May 1997 02:00:55 -0700
Received: from xemacs.eng.sun.com by kindra.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id CAA24104; Wed, 14 May 1997 02:00:56 -0700
Received: by xemacs.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id CAA02645; Wed, 14 May 1997 02:00:55 -0700
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 02:00:55 -0700
Message-Id: <199705140900.CAA02645@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: hpux10 Which X?
In-Reply-To: <u9zptzmm3d.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
References: <u9zptzmm3d.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.24 under 20.1 XEmacs Lucid (beta15)
Reply-To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>

>>>>> "Neal" == Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com> writes:

Neal> We just upgraded from hpux9.05 to hpux10.20.  I am trying to build a
Neal> native 10.20 xemacs-20.2.

Neal> We have X11R5, X11R5, and X11R6 includes and libs.  We have Motif1.1,
Neal> Motif1.2, and Motif1.2_R6.  We have /usr/dt/include, /usr/dt/lib.

The new configure will be able to handle multiple dirs, if we knew what
the right thing was.

Neal> xemacs left to it's own configure (with xmkmf disabled) found /usr/dt
Neal> stuff.  This seems to include X11R5.

Neal> Which set to use?  Should I force it to use X11R6 and forget about
Neal> /usr/dt?

Here's my educated guess: The X Consortium created a special release
of X11R6, X11R6.2, specifically for the CDE vendors (that's why R6.1
was apparently followed by R6.3).  But the CDE vendors haven't gotten
around to releasing a new CDE based on X11R6.2 yet.  Meanwhile the
system vendors also have a vanilla X11R6.3 that's fairly easy to get
working.  So HP decides to ship both.  We can choose between a CDE
based on X11R5 and a non-CDE X11R6.  We'll be lucky if we can mix the two.

HP experts, what do we do?  X11R5 CDE is likely the safe route.

Martin

