From xemacs-m  Mon May 12 11:06:46 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA11482
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 12 May 1997 11:06:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id SAA24356; Mon, 12 May 1997 18:06:42 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: emacsserver, emacsclient
X-Save-Project-Gutenberg: <URL:http://www.promo.net/pg/nl/pgny_nov96.html>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 12 May 1997 18:06:42 +0200
Message-ID: <kigk9l48yjx.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 19.15

Why are we still shipping those?  They seem only to confuse our
users.  IMHO we should junk emacs{client,server}.c and server.el, and
work on the gnu* versions to make them usable.

Is there anything that is not so obvious to me?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
4.  Thou shalt not warlorde a sig if it bee the sig of Kibo, nor if
    it bee the sig of the Inner Circle.

