From xemacs-m  Tue May  6 13:18:16 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA12484
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 6 May 1997 13:18:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id UAA20966; Tue, 6 May 1997 20:18:12 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Minibuffer and  multiple frames
References: <16594.862938741@rtp.ericsson.se> 	<kigd8r44hsz.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <QQcojw27788.199705061805@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
X-Save-Project-Gutenberg: <URL:http://www.promo.net/pg/nl/pgny_nov96.html>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 06 May 1997 20:18:11 +0200
In-Reply-To: Kyle Jones's message of Tue, 6 May 1997 14:05:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <kig911s4g7w.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.50/XEmacs 19.15

Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:

> Hrvoje Niksic writes:
>  > It's definitely annoying.  We should implement the
>  > minibuffer-per-frame stuff correctly.  However, I don't have an
>  > estimate of the amount of work it would take.
> 
> A while ago David Moore pointed out that this basically means
> implementing threading.

Uh, yes.  But I don't remember his exact arguments.  David, could you
remind us what was wrong with the minibuffer-per-frame model?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
I'm sure they'll listen to reason! -- Neal Stevenson, _Snow Crash_

