From xemacs-m  Fri May  2 22:24:24 1997
Received: from iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (galibert@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr [193.49.140.100])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA27800
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 2 May 1997 22:24:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from galibert@localhost) by iria.mines.u-nancy.fr (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id FAA06359; Sat, 3 May 1997 05:23:42 +0200
Message-ID: <19970503052339.54977@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr>
Date: Sat, 3 May 1997 05:23:39 +0200
From: Olivier.Galibert@mines.u-nancy.fr
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: XEmacs 20.2-b4 is released
References: <m2bu6t5lpg.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <kigiv11meuf.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Description: Main Body
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.71
In-Reply-To: <kigiv11meuf.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>; from Hrvoje Niksic on Sat, May 03, 1997 at 05:09:12AM +0200

On Sat, May 03, 1997 at 05:09:12AM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> This is what I meant when I proposed removal of the .info pages
> originally.  We /cannot/ expect people building/installing XEmacs to
> have makeinfo on their systems.  It's inexcusable.

I agree for standard releases, but I think we can ask the beta testers
to have makeinfo. And since beta releases are not as much mirrored as
non-betas, the smaller the tarball the better.

  Sarayan

