From xemacs-m  Fri May  2 14:24:50 1997
Received: from xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA22675;
	Fri, 2 May 1997 14:24:49 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199705021924.OAA22675@xemacs.org>
To: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
cc: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing C-g; zmacs-region woes 
In-reply-to: Your message of "02 May 1997 18:49:56 +0200."
             <kigsp05q0nf.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> 
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 14:24:48 -0500
From: Chuck Thompson <cthomp@xemacs.org>

    Hrv> Oh come on Kyle!  If RMS has an good argument, I'd like to
    Hrv> know it.  If you can give an good argument, give it.  Please
    Hrv> spare us of "RMS says X, so we must do Y", which is implied
    Hrv> by the above.

    Hrv> If a point made by RMS is good, it doesn't mean he's "running
    Hrv> the show."


Iff he has a point that is applicable to XEmacs.  Would someone please
post what RMS has said so it can be discussed?  Obviously there a
number of us who think changing this back would be a big mistake.


			-Chuck

