From xemacs-m  Sat Apr 26 00:02:48 1997
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov (mailhost.lanl.gov [128.165.3.12])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA12609
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 00:02:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from branagh.ta52.lanl.gov (branagh.ta52.lanl.gov [128.165.144.9]) by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id XAA06004 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 23:02:49 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by branagh.ta52.lanl.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id WAA03003; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 22:57:08 -0600
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 22:57:08 -0600
Message-Id: <199704260457.WAA03003@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
From: "John A. Turner" <turner@lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: odd bug (reproducible with -q)
In-Reply-To: <m2ohb3yt6l.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199704250354.VAA17006@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
	<m2ohb3yt6l.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid (beta2)

Steven L Baur writes:

 > I cannot reproduce this either in X11 or running in an xterm.

Me either, when I'm at the console (I assume you saw my other msg.).

 > What does C-h k C-SPC say?

set-mark-command:
[etc.]

Oddness happens with ANSI/color, VT100, etc.

I think this is just gonna have to remain a mystery.  Probably not
XEmacs' fault, and no big deal anyway...

-J

