From xemacs-m  Fri Apr 25 11:05:09 1997
Received: from canker.atype.com (jsc@canker.atype.com [137.103.200.167])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA07623
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:05:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from jsc@localhost)
	by canker.atype.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA07892;
	Fri, 25 Apr 1997 12:04:54 -0400
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 12:04:54 -0400
Message-Id: <199704251604.MAA07892@canker.atype.com>
From: "Jin S. Choi" <jsc@atype.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: gnuattach lossage
Reply-to: jsc@atype.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

I've been using gnuattach, and it's great, but not quite as cool as
running xemacs in screen. There are two significant problems:
1) Can't suspend a gnuattach'ed frame; if you do it kills xemacs.
2) If you are dialed into your system and using gnuattach, and the
   line goes down, it takes out xemacs.

Screen handles both of these cases.



