From xemacs-m  Thu Apr 24 19:52:50 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA11199
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 19:52:46 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA08164;
	Thu, 24 Apr 1997 18:06:00 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.2b2 success on Linux
References: <ubk9ls24ee.fsf@cognac.physik.uni-erlangen.de> <199704250014.JAA06867@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Kazuyoshi Furutaka's message of Fri, 25 Apr 1997 09:14:14 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 24 Apr 1997 18:05:58 -0700
Message-ID: <m2rafzzzbd.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/XEmacs 20.2(beta3)

Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp> writes:

> Well, making w/ Canna 3.5b2 seems O.K.  But when compiled w/ Canna 3.2
> and with the same configuration options it crashes at the final stage of
> 'canna-touroku-region' (registration of word).
> ;; Red Hat Linux 4.1, Kernel 2.0.30, gcc 2.7.2.1, libc 5.3.12, XFree86 3.2

> Of course, Canna 3.2 is OLD...

How should this be tested?  Is it possible to have a dual installation 
of Canna 3.2 and 3.5b2?  I've only built with 3.5b2 and it seems O.K.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

