From xemacs-m  Wed Apr 23 11:20:23 1997
Received: from palrel3.hp.com (palrel3.hp.com [15.253.88.10])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA04392
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 11:20:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cuckoo.hpl.hp.com (cuckoo.hpl.hp.com [15.144.62.116]) by palrel3.hp.com with ESMTP (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA00823; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 09:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from ange@localhost) by cuckoo.hpl.hp.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) id RAA23139; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 17:20:13 +0100 (BST)
To: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Cc: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: The status of gnuattach lossage
References: <kigwwpvqidt.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <byk9lv14f6.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch> <kigzpuqz1w1.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
From: Andy Norman <ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 23 Apr 1997 17:20:13 +0100
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of 23 Apr 1997 08:31:10 +0200
Message-ID: <x5ohb5n22q.fsf@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.45/XEmacs 20.2(beta1)

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> Yes.  It's really obnoxious from gnuserv.el to alias `kill-buffer' to
> something else.  It should run whatever it has to run from a hook
> (e.g. `kill-buffer-hook').  If the appropriate hook doesn't exist, we
> should make it.

gnuserv is ancient.  It existed in the days when there were no hooks or things 
and the only way to get the functionality from lisp was to overwrite the
function.
-- 
						-- ange -- <><

http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/ange		ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com

