From xemacs-m  Tue Apr 22 11:34:49 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA16991
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 11:34:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcmjy09349; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 12:34:46 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 12:34:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQcmjy09349.199704221634@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Goals for the packaging system
In-Reply-To: <kigzpurqmkx.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <vwm3esogoho.fsf@calico.cis.ohio-state.edu>
	<199704221159.NAA02757@daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de>
	<kigzpurqmkx.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.28 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid (beta1)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

<<scream>>

Once again the discussion has degenerated into what ought to go
into what package, what is useful, what is not, ... all of
which is still irrelevant at this point in the game.  We need
to concentrate on the issues at hand.

My conclusion:  We need a smaller working group.

