From xemacs-m  Mon Apr 21 08:01:30 1997
Received: from frege.math.ethz.ch (root@frege-d-math-north-g-west.math.ethz.ch [129.132.145.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA17367
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 08:01:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from midget.math.ethz.ch (vroonhof@midget [129.132.145.4]) by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/Main-STAT-mailer) with ESMTP id PAA19864 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 15:00:38 +0200
Received: (vroonhof@localhost) by midget.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/D-MATH-client) id PAA24770; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 15:00:14 +0200
Sender: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Losing a frame
References: <kighgh1frav.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m2vi5hmqns.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <bysp0k63ym.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch> <kigu3l0bpmj.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
Date: 21 Apr 1997 15:00:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of 21 Apr 1997 13:07:48 +0200
Message-ID: <byrag45y5e.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> (eq bla-bla t) is unlispy if `bla-bla' is supposed to be a boolean.
> Otherwise, I don't think there's anything wrong with it.  In this
> case, since in the visibility could also be 'icon, the explicit test
> against t was a necessity.

I meant that it was probably a bad idea to introduce the 'icon stuff..
Now the meaning of (frame-visible-p) becomes ambigous. Unless of
course you want "'icon" to read as "visible but iconfied" but that is
not how the rest of Emacs treats the term visible.

Jan

Since XEmacs has a seperate frame-iconified-p, I am assuming 'icon
is a later edition.

