From xemacs-m  Mon Apr 21 05:20:41 1997
Received: from frege.math.ethz.ch (root@frege-d-math-north-g-west.math.ethz.ch [129.132.145.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA15794
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 05:20:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from midget.math.ethz.ch (vroonhof@midget [129.132.145.4]) by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/Main-STAT-mailer) with ESMTP id MAA16309 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 12:19:20 +0200
Received: (vroonhof@localhost) by midget.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/D-MATH-client) id MAA23148; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 12:18:55 +0200
Sender: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Losing a frame
References: <kighgh1frav.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m2vi5hmqns.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
Date: 21 Apr 1997 12:18:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 20 Apr 1997 12:37:43 -0700
Message-ID: <byu3l065m8.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> It's probably related to the new visibility algorithm.  Here are two
> methods of reproducing it:

It is. deiconify-emacs is not working right. I'm looking into it.

> With olvwm, get two frames and move one of them to one of the other
> virtual consoles.  Hit C-z on the visible frame and the other frame on 
> the other virtual console disappears.  Checking the `Window Menu' in
> the window manager root menu, shows that the other frame is indeed
> gone.  (frame-list) still shows the other frame.

frame-iconified-p and frame-visible-p get the right results on both frames.

If you call deiconify-frame on your lost frame you get it back.

Jan

