From xemacs-m  Sat Dec 28 04:15:32 1996
Received: from sol1.cybernet-ag.net (sol1.cybernet-ag.net [194.221.86.98])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id EAA04473 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 1996 04:15:30 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from aseibert@localhost) by sol1.cybernet-ag.net  id LAA17578; Sat, 28 Dec 1996 11:15:07 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 11:15:07 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199612281015.LAA17578@sol1.cybernet-ag.net>
From: Axel Seibert <aseibert@cybernet-ag.net>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: xemacs-19.15b4/b4 report for NEXTSTEP

Hi, all!

After a couple of months of inactivity last weekend I found the time
to get myself a complete and fresh copy of xemacs-19.15b4.

It unpacked, configured, compiled and ran fine under NEXTSTEP 3.2.

Then I got the patch to beta5. I applied it and found the following
.rej-files: 

{axel}local/src/xemacs-19.15-b5 66 > find . -name \*.rej -print
./lisp/mel/mel-b.el.rej
./lisp/mel/mel-g.el.rej
./lisp/mel/mel-q.el.rej
./lisp/mel/mel-u.el.rej
./lisp/mel/mel.el.rej
./lisp/mu/mu-bbdb.el.rej
./lisp/mu/mu-cite.el.rej
./lisp/mu/std11-parse.el.rej
./lisp/mu/std11.el.rej
./lisp/mu/tl-822.el.rej
./lisp/tl/cless.el.rej
[...]
./lisp/tl/tu-replace.el.rej
./lisp/tm/gnus-art-mime.el.rej
[...]
./lisp/tm/tmh-comp.el.rej
./CHANGES-beta.rej
./Makefile.rej

Most of these seem to be due to a mismatch of the version string
(e.g., here is one of the .rej files:

***************
*** 5,11 ****
  ;; Author: MORIOKA Tomohiko <morioka@jaist.ac.jp>
  ;; Created: 1996/8/6
  ;; Version:
- ;;    $Id: gnus-art-mime.el,v 1.1.1.1 1996/12/18 03:55:31 steve Exp
$
  ;; Keywords: news, MIME, multimedia, multilingual, encoded-word
  
  ;; This file is not part of GNU Emacs yet.
--- 5,11 ----
  ;; Author: MORIOKA Tomohiko <morioka@jaist.ac.jp>
  ;; Created: 1996/8/6
  ;; Version:
+ ;;    $Id: gnus-art-mime.el,v 1.2 1996/12/22 00:29:34 steve Exp $
  ;; Keywords: news, MIME, multimedia, multilingual, encoded-word
  
  ;; This file is not part of GNU Emacs yet.

Now tell me, if I did something wrong with the patch? Do I have to run
cvs in order to patch the files correctly? Sorry if I missed
something...(and no, I don't want to ftp the whole distribution
again...) 

And there is something else, that I don't understand: beta5 can't
compile any more:

[...]
cc -c -Demacs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -I.
-I/usr/local/src/xemacs-19.15-b5/src
-g -pipe callproc.c
syssignal.h:91: syntax error, found `int'
syssignal.h:91: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `int'
syssignal.h:91: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `int'
*** Exit 1
Stop.

Looking at this file I find:

typedef SIGTYPE (*signal_handler_t) (int);

and doing a diff between syssignal.h and syssignal.h.orig (obviously
from the patch b4-b5):

91,92d90
< typedef SIGTYPE (*signal_handler_t) (int);
< 
96a95
> typedef SIGTYPE (*signal_handler_t) (int);

Any comments & suggestions are welcome.

Axel

-- 
Axel Seibert |   CYBERNET   Internet    | You are young only once but you
Internet &   |   Dienstleistungen AG    | can stay immature indefinitely.
Netzwerke    | aseibert@cybernet-ag.net |

