From xemacs-m  Mon Apr  7 20:03:29 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA16803
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 20:03:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQckhw12022; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 21:03:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 21:03:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQckhw12022.199704080103@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: xemacs "flavours" of packages
In-Reply-To: <m27mies6mu.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <rvvi5yxw4m.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
	<QQckhs11118.199704080002@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<m27mies6mu.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.24 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Steven L Baur writes:
 > Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:
 >  [Otherwise good comments]
 > 
 > > And I only hated him a little bit for doing that.  So I'd suggest
 > > adding a dot plus an XE and some digits.
 >                        ^^
 > Arrrgghhh!!!!!!!!!!!!

Or not.

 > Can we think of something else please?  This naming of XEmacs by some
 > people as XE is really getting on my nerves.  I don't think we should
 > encourage it in any fashion.
 > 
 > (It's XEmacs, not XE, not Xemacs, not GNU XEmacs, it's just plain XEmacs).

Didn't know it was an issue for you; it just seemed a reasonable
abbreviation.  .XEmacs### is fine with me.

