From xemacs-m  Mon Apr  7 01:41:25 1997
Received: from macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (macon2.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.13.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA19675
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 01:41:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (modas.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.3]) by macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.8.4/8.8.3/AIX-4.1/WSI-1.0) with SMTP id IAA28872 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 08:41:22 +0200
Received: by modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA17190; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 08:41:20 +0200
Sender: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: facemenu and `M-g'
References: <kigpvw8gnwy.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <rvhghjztys.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <m2k9mf7osd.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <kigpvw7lqr8.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <y9lg1x32x20.fsf@modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <kign2rbnycq.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
Date: 07 Apr 1997 08:41:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of 07 Apr 1997 08:25:25 +0200
Message-Id: <y9lbu7r2v3k.fsf@modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Lines: 30
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.40/XEmacs 20.1(beta11)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by xemacs.org id BAA19676

>>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

Hrvoje> sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes:

>> Gosh, not *that* discussion again.  (I think this is the third time.)
>> M-g *is* a bug, but it's a design bug that's the same as in FSF Emacs.
>> It's not a bug issue, it's a policy issue.  IMHO, we should leave it
>> there---people can change it if they want.

Hrvoje> Yes, as long as facemenu is not automatically loaded.  Since there is
Hrvoje> a package that loads facemenu automatically (without the user being
Hrvoje> aware), and facemenu shadows an important global binding, to me it's a
Hrvoje> bug.

Hrvoje> I still think my patch should be applied.

Again, that's not the point.

The question is what's more important: Doing the design (precious
little as it may be in this case) right or keeping FSFmacs
compatibility.

You have to decide on policy to decide the question.  Steve is
qualified to do that.  We aren't.
-- 
Cheers =8-} Chipsy
Friede, Vlkerverstndigung und berhaupt blabla

