From xemacs-m  Sun Apr  6 14:38:32 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA03958
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 14:38:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id VAA01411; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 21:38:30 +0200 (MET DST)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Value of overlay.el
References: <m0wDsKG-000h9tC@wander.control.att.com> <QQckdh01466.199704061924@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nA
        EL1M(".[qvI#a2E6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/X
        vhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 06 Apr 1997 21:38:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: Kyle Jones's message of Sun, 6 Apr 1997 15:24:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <kig3et4lz62.fsf_-_@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15

Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:

> More overlay.el lossage and again it is VM's fault for inadvertently
> mixing the extent/overlay interfaces.  Fixed in VM 6.24.

Finally, how does `overlay.el' scale up, in your opinion (with the
list->cons change made, of course)?  Is it still on the `oboy' level,
or is it a usable emulation of GNU Emacs overlay mechanism?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Oh lord won't you buy me a color TV...

