From xemacs-m  Wed Apr  2 19:27:05 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA04993
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 19:27:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA03178;
	Wed, 2 Apr 1997 17:39:55 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: configure bug in 19.15 final, and problem with BSD/OS binary kit
References: <w4n2rh7wo0.fsf@loiosh.kei.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Christopher Davis's message of 02 Apr 1997 19:54:55 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 02 Apr 1997 17:39:53 -0800
Message-ID: <m2rags6g0m.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 30
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.40/XEmacs 20.1(beta11)

Christopher Davis <ckd@loiosh.kei.com> writes:

> The bug: it doesn't print 
> if [ "$with_ncurses" = "yes" ]; then
>   echo "  Compiling in support for ncurses."
> fi

should be

if [ "$have_ncurses" = "yes" ]; then
  echo "  Compiling in support for ncurses."
fi

I've fixed this in 20.1-b11.

> even though it is compiling in that ncurses I happened to have lying around.

I see
#define HAVE_NCURSES 1

in src/config.h so it is doing The Right Thing.

> The BSD/OS binary kit problem: because of the preceding, you have to have
> terminfo descriptions for your terminals or TTY mode doesn't work.

You mean it shouldn't have autodetected and used ncurses instead of
native BSD curses?
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

