From xemacs-m  Fri Mar 28 10:16:34 1997
Received: from bittersweet.inetarena.com (karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com [206.129.216.38])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA06218
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 10:16:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from karlheg@localhost)
	by bittersweet.inetarena.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA01756;
	Fri, 28 Mar 1997 08:16:23 -0800
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 08:16:23 -0800
Message-Id: <199703281616.IAA01756@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
From: "Karl M. Hegbloom" <karlheg@inetarena.com>
To: <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Linux binary: libdb.so.1 not found, redhat strikes (out) again
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
Comments: Hyperbole mail buttons accepted, v04.023.
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="Multipart_Fri_Mar_28_08:16:22_1997-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--Multipart_Fri_Mar_28_08:16:22_1997-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII


 The Linux binary will not run on a redhat 3.0.3 system; it's the 
bin/xemacs: can't load library 'libdb.so.1'  problem.

 There is an aout libdb.so.1.85.1 there, and an ELF libdb.so.2 that I
suspect is really ELF libdb.so.1.85.2, renamed by RH when they went
ELF...?

 I'm going to (for now; I'm not root there) rcp libdb.so.1.85.2 from
home, and test it with that in a LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/lib.

 ldd shows that as being the only lib not found there.  I don't have
access to any newer redhat versions;  Debian checks; that binary would
run, AFAIK.


--Multipart_Fri_Mar_28_08:16:22_1997-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Karl M. Hegbloom <karlheg@inetarena.com>
http://www.inetarena.com/~karlheg
Portland, OR  USA
Debian GNU 1.2  Linux 2.0.29t
You tell me and we'll both know.


--Multipart_Fri_Mar_28_08:16:22_1997-1--

