From xemacs-m  Thu Mar 27 03:49:54 1997
Received: from mgate.uni-hannover.de (mgate.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA12487
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 03:49:53 -0600 (CST)
Received: from helios (actually helios.tnt.uni-hannover.de) by mgate 
          with SMTP (PP); Thu, 27 Mar 1997 10:49:38 +0100
Received: from daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de by helios (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) 
          id KAA04011; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 10:48:43 +0100
Received: by daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA22266;
          Thu, 27 Mar 1997 10:48:40 +0100
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 10:48:40 +0100
Message-Id: <199703270948.KAA22266@daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de>
From: Heiko Muenkel <muenkel@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: turner@lanl.gov
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Binary Kit Builders
In-Reply-To: <199703270512.WAA05582@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
References: <m2d8smi2ff.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199703270512.WAA05582@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid (beta104)
X-Face: n}R'l6CHRf>pi&bj7[x0CW3:kmXm@1)7m+l*9[fp;-Ow4Xe~=5E;skf?2> 
        y]f{HzB|Q(\V9+y$PP~.4G[2n4W7{6Ilm[AMY9B:0kj.K_$-d%p4YIF*bX;=ADp6{ 
        HS@NEv9c.VII+9PgXHASx}K(jy^t=q%qzZ72q1e4E;O!$A$`&wgtLk"1%p.nC_G!] 
        4d1!+J4Q#YD_iXeEy`1x)d\r$1Qn\'23n|[8Y_xzuXJJ7W(EGqnzB]`]aq??;+z=) 
        DW~\'Vq&F'g%QU[Mv2:}nS>SdZFTEC2GsgB=Q,:~H<R5S[:ZN%B:s0;|v1x"Jb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "John" == John A Turner <turner@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov> writes:

    John> Steven L Baur writes:
    >> Richard Cognot <cognot@ensg.u-nancy.fr>
    >> xemacs-19.15-mips-sgi-irix6.3.tar.gz

    >> John Turner <turner@lanl.gov>
    >> xemacs-19.15-mips-sgi-irix6.2.tar.gz

    John> Just wondering if one of these is redundant.  From the
    John> PROBLEMS file, I'd guess that neither will run on the other
    John> OS, but just thought I'd check before building...

I don't know very much about the IRIX systems, but we have some SGI's
at our site. One of it has R10000 processors. uname -a returns IRIX64
bach 6.2 03131016 IP25. It is a 64 bit machine and I think that it is
not compatible with the other 32 bit machines of SGI. If this is true,
we will need also a binary kit for this machine. I'll try it, if no
one else can do it better (at the moment there's no additional
Freeware installed on it, no gcc, no pgm, no jpeg and so on :-().

