From xemacs-m  Tue Mar 25 07:54:17 1997
Received: from aut.alcatel.at (atusks01.aut.alcatel.at [146.112.129.10])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA28723
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 07:54:14 -0600 (CST)
Received: from atusels1.aut.alcatel.at by aut.alcatel.at (8.7.2/AAA_1)
	id OAA00909; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 14:53:57 +0100 (MET)
Received: from atusel63.alcatel.at by atusels1.aut.alcatel.at (5.x/ELEKTRA-1.0)
	id AA08359 for xemacs-beta@xemacs.org;; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 14:53:57 +0100
Received: by atusel63.alcatel.at (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA28835; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 14:53:54 +0100
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 14:53:54 +0100
Message-Id: <199703251353.OAA28835@atusel63.alcatel.at>
From: Martin Pottendorfer <Martin.Pottendorfer@aut.alcatel.at>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: where to send patches (is xemacs-beta-patches@xemacs.org valid) ?
X-Mailer: VM 6.21 under 20.1 XEmacs Lucid (beta9)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

from `xemacs-beta subscriber info':
[...] Patches should always be sent to xemacs-beta-patches. [...]

i assumed `xemacs-beta-patches@xemacs.org'.

after sending a patch i got:

... while talking to mailhost.xemacs.org.:
>>> RCPT To:<xemacs-beta-patches@xemacs.org>
<<< 550 <xemacs-beta-patches@xemacs.org>... User unknown
550 <xemacs-beta-patches@xemacs.org>... User unknown

any clues ?

martin

