From xemacs-m  Tue Mar 25 04:00:34 1997
Received: from mgate.uni-hannover.de (mgate.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA23577
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 04:00:33 -0600 (CST)
Received: from helios (actually helios.tnt.uni-hannover.de) by mgate 
          with SMTP (PP); Tue, 25 Mar 1997 10:59:41 +0100
Received: from daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de by helios (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) 
          id KAA05881; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 10:58:42 +0100
Received: by daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA17251;
          Tue, 25 Mar 1997 10:58:38 +0100
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 10:58:38 +0100
Message-Id: <199703250958.KAA17251@daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de>
From: Heiko Muenkel <muenkel@tnt.uni-hannover.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: steve@miranova.com
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: etags.el broken in 19.15 beta 104
In-Reply-To: <m267yga5lq.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199703241639.RAA16026@daedalus.tnt.uni-hannover.de> <m267yga5lq.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid (beta104)
X-Face: n}R'l6CHRf>pi&bj7[x0CW3:kmXm@1)7m+l*9[fp;-Ow4Xe~=5E;skf?2> 
        y]f{HzB|Q(\V9+y$PP~.4G[2n4W7{6Ilm[AMY9B:0kj.K_$-d%p4YIF*bX;=ADp6{ 
        HS@NEv9c.VII+9PgXHASx}K(jy^t=q%qzZ72q1e4E;O!$A$`&wgtLk"1%p.nC_G!] 
        4d1!+J4Q#YD_iXeEy`1x)d\r$1Qn\'23n|[8Y_xzuXJJ7W(EGqnzB]`]aq??;+z=) 
        DW~\'Vq&F'g%QU[Mv2:}nS>SdZFTEC2GsgB=Q,:~H<R5S[:ZN%B:s0;|v1x"Jb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "sb" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

    sb> Heiko Muenkel writes:
    >> The TAGS file at the end of this mail works without any
    >> problems in the Emacs 19. All tags could be found.

    sb> Does 19.14 behave the same way, I suppose?  There has been one
    sb> change to etags.el since 19.14 (in 19.15-b1 or 19.15-b2):

You're right, the same bug is also in 19.14.

