From xemacs-m  Sun Mar 23 16:34:14 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA09095
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 16:34:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id XAA08441; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 23:33:18 +0100 (MET)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Buffer-specific display-tables
References: <199703231932.NAA08536@xemacs.org>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nA
        EL1M(".[qvI#a2E6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/X
        vhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 23 Mar 1997 23:33:18 +0100
In-Reply-To: Chuck Thompson's message of Sun, 23 Mar 1997 13:32:51 -0600
Message-ID: <kig913edys1.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.33/XEmacs 19.14

Chuck Thompson <cthomp@xemacs.org> writes:

>     Kyle> Something has got to give.  The display code need to
>     Kyle> reference specifiers.  specifier_instance can call eval,
>     Kyle> which means it can GC.  So I think the instantiators that
>     Kyle> can call eval have got to go.
> 
> Actually, no it can't.

Does it mean the display table problem is fixable?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
main(){printf(&unix["\021%six\012\0"],(unix)["have"]+"fun"-0x60);}

