From xemacs-m  Sat Mar 22 13:32:49 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA29792
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 13:32:47 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id UAA00840; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 20:32:43 +0100 (MET)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Confusing behaviour with `C-next'
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nA
        EL1M(".[qvI#a2E6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/X
        vhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 22 Mar 1997 20:32:43 +0100
Message-ID: <kigd8srvi1w.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.33/XEmacs 19.14

Have you ever pressed `C-next' accidentally?  IMHO XEmacs becomes very
confusing for a user who presses it by mistake, because you can move
around the buffer, but it doesn't abandon the viewpoint offset.

A few days ago a not-exactly-inexperienced user came to me and said
that XEmacs has gone mad, and that all he has in the buffer are some
arrows on the left side of the screen.  He solved it by killing the
buffer, but only later have I realized that in he got it by pressing
`C-next'.  BTW, it gets even worse if you press it twice, thrice, etc.

Could XEmacs behave more intuitively here, like get reset the offset
to 0 when you move around the buffer?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Psychos _do not_ explode when sunlight hits them."

