From xemacs-m  Fri Mar 21 13:26:02 1997
Received: from newman (root@newman.aventail.com [38.225.141.10])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA05131
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 13:26:00 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kramer.in.aventail.com.aventail.com (wmperry@kramer [192.168.1.12]) by newman (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA06676; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 11:23:20 -0800
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 11:23:20 -0800
Message-Id: <199703211923.LAA06676@newman>
From: "William M. Perry" <wmperry@aventail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Sudish Joseph <sj@eng.mindspring.net>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Customize faces slow (known problem?) (b101)
In-Reply-To: <yvia3etpjbwg.fsf@atreides.eng.mindspring.net>
References: <by3etq4vk9.fsf@math.ethz.ch>
	<199703211433.JAA23141@amber.vis-av.com>
	<yvia3etpjbwg.fsf@atreides.eng.mindspring.net>
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
Reply-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;

Sudish Joseph writes:
>Derrell Lipman writes:
>> That is exactly the behavior that I am seeing, on a fast 200MHz
>> Pentium Pro.
>
>FWIW, M-x customize RET faces RET takes around a second to create the
>buffer on my PPro 200 with Linux and the XInside 1.3 server (this
>-old-, but still much faster than XFree with my #9).

  This is different than what the other people are doing.  Try doing 
M-x customize-face RET all RET

  This takes longer than M-x customize RET faces RET for me on my PPRO200
(linux, MetroX), but not much.  ~8 seconds according to:

M-: (let ((st (current-time)) nd) (customize-face "") (- (nth 1 (current-time)) (nth 1 st))) RET

  This is with 109 faces defined - all the custom/widget ones, all the GNUS
ones, and font-lock.

-Bill P.

