From xemacs-m  Thu Mar 20 03:11:29 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA06661
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 03:11:28 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA23174;
	Thu, 20 Mar 1997 01:23:14 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Subwindows: 8bpp garbage-collect cursor
References: <199703200906.BAA28758@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: "Karl M. Hegbloom"'s message of Thu, 20 Mar 1997 01:06:48 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 20 Mar 1997 01:23:09 -0800
Message-ID: <m24te6ex36.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 10
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.32/XEmacs 20.1(beta9)

Karl M Hegbloom writes:
>  [forest green recycle cursor]
>  So why doesn't it look right on my 16bpp Xserver?

I noticed the same thing going from 8 bit to 24 bit.  Actually, I like 
the forest green better.  Not that I can explain why there's a
difference.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

