From xemacs-m  Wed Mar 19 18:15:45 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA29503
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 18:15:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA18612;
	Wed, 19 Mar 1997 16:27:22 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: In memory JPEG (was Re: Subwindows)
References: <12558.858809513@kocrsw12> 	<25066.858811919@rtp.ericsson.se> 	<m2ybbjwk36.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> 	<QQchpm15669.199703192336@crystal.WonderWorks.COM> 	<m2iv2niggl.fsf_-_@altair.xemacs.org> <199703200004.QAA19661@newman>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: "William M. Perry"'s message of Wed, 19 Mar 1997 16:04:25 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 19 Mar 1997 16:27:20 -0800
Message-ID: <m2g1xrif13.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.32/XEmacs 20.1(beta9)

William M Perry writes:

>   Oh, so _THATS_ the part I never got back to implementing! :)

I see.  Next question:  who does bounds/sanity checking on that
routine?  The one thing I'm certain about is that routine will be
called often with corrupted images.

Is it safe to let byte_in_buffer get below 0?
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

