From xemacs-m  Tue Mar 18 22:17:44 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA21015
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 22:17:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQchmn21909; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 23:17:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 23:17:42 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQchmn21909.199703190417@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.1b8 success on Solaris -- but it's *SLOW*
In-Reply-To: <m2k9n4po96.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199703190222.SAA10998@sandman>
	<m2k9n4po96.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.20 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid (beta100)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Steven L Baur writes:
 > Does this patch help?  No one has commented on it so I haven't applied
 > it.

Both hunks failed on 20.1-b8 here.  It applied OK to 19.15-b100
so I'm running it there now, mostly to see if it makes things
blow up on BSD/OS.  It hasn't broken anything so far.

