From xemacs-m  Mon Mar 17 11:00:02 1997
Received: from cdc.noaa.gov (manager.Colorado.EDU [128.138.218.210])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA29582
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 11:00:02 -0600 (CST)
Received: from rossby by cdc.noaa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA12455; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 09:59:58 -0700
Received: by rossby (SMI-8.6) id JAA14913; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 09:59:57 -0700
Sender: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Cc: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [ 19.15-b99 and 20.1-b7] build FAILURE on Solaris-2.5/X11R6.3/cc-4.0
References: <m2vi6si7nw.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <vkhgibh8ud.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov> <m2afo222b4.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado
X-Attribution: mb
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Mark Borges <mdb@cdc.noaa.gov>
Date: 17 Mar 1997 09:59:52 -0700
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 17 Mar 1997 03:19:43 -0800
Message-ID: <vkvi6qsbcn.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.23/XEmacs 20.1

>> On 17 Mar 1997 03:19:43 -0800,
>> Steven L Baur(sb) wrote:
sb> Mark Borges writes:
>> This must be sparcworks related...

sb> Yup.  Why, oh why can't sparcworks behave like the rest of XEmacs???

sb> Temporary workaround is to compile without Sparcworks or whatever
sb> specifically forces comint.elc to be dumped with XEmacs.

I thought Martin always built --with-sparcworks? Does this mean these
betas are unusable for you, too, Martin?

-- 
  -mb-

