From xemacs-m  Fri Mar 14 21:44:17 1997
Received: from amber.vis-av.com (amber.vis-av.com [206.119.44.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA14842
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 21:44:15 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from derrell@localhost)
          by amber.vis-av.com (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id WAA03828; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 22:44:07 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 22:44:07 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199703150344.WAA03828@amber.vis-av.com>
From: Derrell Lipman <derrell@vis-av.com>
To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [comp.xemacs.xemacs]: forwarded message from Michael Uelschen
In-Reply-To: <m2913qeyge.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <QQcgvv19473.199703141549@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<199703141642.LAA29628@black-ice.cc.vt.edu>
	<QQcgwa20642.199703141708@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<rvbu8mmjeq.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
	<QQcgwf21845.199703141829@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<rv913qmgfq.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
	<QQcgwn23546.199703142016@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<rv4teemcp3.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
	<QQcgwp24209.199703142057@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<m2913qeyge.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Reply-To: derrell@vis-av.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "  Steven" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

  Steven> sendmail.el it is.  Is the function name of
  Steven> `user-mail-address' acceptable to everyone?  --

To avoid compatibility problems later, how about naming it according
to the package which it is in.  In this case, if it's going in to
sendmail.el, I would name it `sendmail-user-mail-address' or
`sendmail-user-address' or something along those lines.


