From xemacs-m  Wed Mar 12 08:40:37 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA10890
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 08:40:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: from Canada.Sun.COM ([129.155.5.101]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id GAA06025 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 06:40:23 -0800
Received: from scooter.canada.sun.com by Canada.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id JAA13095; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 09:39:55 -0500
Received: from verve.canada.sun.com by scooter.canada.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA26810; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 09:38:27 -0500
Received: by verve.canada.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA26229; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 09:38:28 -0500
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 09:38:28 -0500
Message-Id: <199703121438.JAA26229@verve.canada.sun.com>
From: Georg Nikodym <georgn@Canada.Sun.COM>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 19.15beta98 compilation problem in Digital UNIX
In-Reply-To: <199703120212.SAA10090@hexadecimal.uoregon.edu>
References: <199703120212.SAA10090@hexadecimal.uoregon.edu>
Reply-To: georgn@Canada.Sun.COM
X-Face:  ,~EI@l7'&P{\d++e`EMjNTNpzsxJPg(H]?Sd_T3xIlq[(PT[.D;A_/k)qfeC@m\/1]A{vZD
 r4&Lme-/M]c'Q>>:VM|L^<ED=j@dG!ld,bQ:IhT53q'x>6wZKH3iCT6Ff1-`*z{vCiT}+%(irA6TOn
 S~pFtml1bL\=kp%0PsLcF3+Q/e${o|S/<NUFDrU@;^o(D+av1g>Ce=ztlPGb$?up%c-*l'wmjw\sw;
 D__0Z;+93I+Kx6Mxdc]+|2V03aE@D8-fMT_v[~~FC9I\*|72QVW,aQ!`hHp_.gE.W&kxla2#)\Cmo
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "SV" == Steve VanDevender <stevev@hexadecimal.uoregon.edu> writes:

 SV> XEmacs 19.15beta98 doesn't compile out of the box under Digital
 SV> UNIX 4.0B using gcc 2.7.2.1, configured with "./configure
 SV> --cflags=-O2".  The compilation fails at line 943 of
 SV> src/console.c with an error in:

 SV> sys_suspend_process(XINT(Fconsole_tty_controlling_process(console)));

Glad to see that I'm not the only one with Attention Deficit
Disorder ;-)

But seriously, can we (or Steve) invent a way to mark or bless
patches?  I do deliberately ignore/miss many patches when my personal
load-average gets too high and it would be nice to be able to
_quickly_ identify the "official" patches for the current beta...

