From xemacs-m  Tue Mar 11 06:20:39 1997
Received: from lemcbed.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de (lemcbed.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.103.197])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA04111
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 06:20:38 -0600 (CST)
Received: by lemcbed.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de; id AA00377; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:22:45 +0100
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.1b6 display-time/scrollbar bug
References: <199703111044.KAA14079@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>
X-Face: Z[@OB)("ZvE?ev~1b+b!0ZUB.$%rh.9qE>dVf>q}Q/V?%d`J3gd!LR\aAZ8<Hwi]xTA(:*c;i3,?K?+rCy*^b$)a,}E?eo},}x2]5LlJysyoUOK"o[>K)'\Ulb7y-7*.If^;rHl['oa)n_M7E6w+LDKMs"G8_`c)uOS1^}.1|8Ill]7X68X-paeUOpBhz<F`B0?~^2Et~GYfw~/0]H]nx4~C_E/_mp#^7Ixc:
Reply-To: jens@lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jens Lautenbacher <jens@lemcbed.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Date: 11 Mar 1997 13:22:45 +0100
In-Reply-To: Andy Norman's message of Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:44:33 +0000
Message-Id: <x2bu8qpqi2.fsf@lemcbed.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Lines: 24
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.16/XEmacs 19.15

Andy Norman <ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com> writes:

> I run with scrollbars compiled out.  Doing M-x display-time, I get the
> following backtrace:
> 
> Signaling: (void-variable display-time-1-glyph)
>   eval(display-time-1-glyph)
>   display-time-convert-num-to-pics("10:39")
>   display-time-evaluate-list()
>   display-time-function()
>   #<compiled-function (from "time.elc") nil "...(51)" [get-itimer "display-time" old delete-itimer display-time-string global-mode-string remove display-time-echo-area ("") append (display-time-string) display-time-function start-itimer display-time-interval] 6 ("/home/ange/emacs/xemacs-rel/lisp/packages/time.elc" . 2024) nil>()
>   call-interactively(display-time)
>   command-execute(display-time t)
>   execute-extended-command(nil)
>   call-interactively(execute-extended-command)
> 
> Call if you need more info.

what gives (featurep 'xpm) ? It seems from your setup that it should
give nil. But I think I have protected the code by this everywhere...

     JTL


