From xemacs-m  Tue Dec 17 08:06:44 1996
Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id IAA29619 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 08:06:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from clusaz.gvc.dec.com by mail1.digital.com (5.65 EXP 4/12/95 for V3.2/1.0/WV)
	id AA16641; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 05:23:58 -0800
Received: from fornet.gvc.dec.com by clusaz.gvc.dec.com; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Sep95-8.2MPM)
	id AA02478; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 14:23:57 +0100
Received: by fornet.gvc.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/23Sep96-1024AM)
	id AA19337; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 14:23:54 +0100
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 14:23:54 +0100
Message-Id: <9612171323.AA19337@fornet.gvc.dec.com>
From: Steve Carney <carney@gvc.dec.com>
To: Eric Benson <eb@amazon.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: RE: Subprocess problems in alpha-dec-osf4.0
In-Reply-To: <32AF1597.4303C54C@amazon.com>
References: <yngengx3zlc.fsf@colargol.idb.hist.no>
	<32AEFD4D.485BA89D@amazon.com>
	<32AF1597.4303C54C@amazon.com>
Reply-To: carney@gvc.dec.com
X-Face: (d*XRr}%:j,s*8+_o];-"-<<Sd1>H?Ds*>_vV}6DVjhNkjSRW0z^9[WBrbtMma>lyW6u>r(
 9U_m6J0kh7U=q?(h[7<YtS!Cu[Yl)D_XSCy5+tw>_2qr&4S=n|A*ScV]5BR{3]YXk$!,4l2vh9B]}&
 0p"&#\I

eb@amazon.com (Eric Benson) writes, in <32AF1597.4303C54C@amazon.com>:

>In addition to the assertion failure problem I described in my last
>message, process_send_signal, or at least interrupt-process, doesn't
>seem to work at all.

I had the same problems starting in 15b2 (I think) with DUNIX 3.2D.  I
reported the crash with trace info, and there's been no fix as far as I
know.

The dump seem to happen during subprocess creation or deletion.  From
the stack info, I couldn't figure out what the problem was.

        Steve

