From xemacs-m  Wed Mar  5 10:36:35 1997
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (CNRI.Reston.VA.US [132.151.1.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA00949
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 10:36:34 -0600 (CST)
Received: from newcnri.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10474;
          5 Mar 97 11:38 EST
Received: from anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US by newcnri.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id LAA25003; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 11:38:27 -0500
Received: by anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id LAA21186; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 11:38:25 -0500
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 11:38:25 -0500
Message-Id: <199703051638.LAA21186@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
From: "Barry A. Warsaw" <bwarsaw@anthem.cnri.reston.va.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: python-mode font-lock
References: <E0w2IyS-0001Jd-00@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
Reply-To: bwarsaw@python.org
X-Attribution: BAW
X-Oblique-Strategy: A line has two sides
X-Url: http://www.python.org/~bwarsaw


>>>>> "NB" == Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com> writes:

    NB> I just visited a python file, and it wasn't fontified.  Is
    NB> this a change in 20.1b5?  Do I now need to add

    NB> (add-hook 'python-mode-hook 'turn-on-font-lock)

Did my font-lock.el changes make it into 20.1b5 but not python-mode
2.90?  Using 19.15b97 with my font-lock changes (which remove
python-font-lock-keywords), but python-mode.el 2.90 (which put the
font-lock-defaults property on python-mode), .py files get font-locked
automatically for me.

This stuff is all different in Emacs and XEmacs, so let me know if I
got the magic incantation wrong.

-Barry

