From xemacs-m  Thu Feb 27 13:34:23 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA07738
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 13:34:21 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQceta22666; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 14:34:15 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 14:34:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQceta22666.199702271934@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Why does movemail not support KPOP?
In-Reply-To: <m2lo8aukuz.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199702271606.LAA04082@the-great-machine.mit.edu>
	<m2lo8aukuz.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Steven L Baur writes:
 > Jered Floyd writes:
 > 
 > > All of the users who use XEmacs for mail handling here at MIT have
 > > to kludge around this with a non-XEmacs movemail.  If the XEmacs movemail
 > > is supposed to be synced to 19.28, why doesn't it have the Kerberos
 > > and Hesiod support found in FSF Emacs? Thanks
 > 
 > I don't know.
 > 
 > Can we just replace movemail.c with the one in Emacs 19.34?

As long as "movemail file1 file2" keeps working, it makes no
difference to me.  VM has never relied on any of movemail's POP
features.

