From xemacs-m  Sun Feb 23 02:53:07 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA09270
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 02:53:06 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id JAA14289; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 09:53:05 +0100 (MET)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: kp_ keysyms don't bind
References: <199702230220.VAA18790@blight.IntraNet.com> <m2afowb5lf.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nAEL1M(".[qvI#a2E
 6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/XvhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 23 Feb 1997 09:53:04 +0100
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 22 Feb 1997 18:48:12 -0800
Message-ID: <kiglo8f9a4v.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 25
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 19.14

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> Jonathan Edwards writes:
> > In 19.15b95 keysyms of the form kp_0 are not being bound.
> > global-set-key accepts them, but the kp_0 key does not in fact get
> > bound (and is reported as the kp-0 key).
> 
> So far so good, this is intended.  The obsolete usage of
> kp_... etc. has been replaced by the more compatible kp-... notation.
> The underscore notation is accepted and silently converted to the
> minus sign for backwards compatibility.

No, Jonathan says that kp_0 doesn't get bound *at all*.  Like, you do:

(global-set-key [kp_0] 'foo)

And pressing kp_0 does nothing.  I don't think that was ever
intended.  `kp_0' key should be the same as `kp-0', always.  We should
preserve that much backward compatibility.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Thou Who might be our Father Who perhaps may be in Heaven...
                                                  -- Zelazny

