From xemacs-m  Sat Feb 22 20:36:18 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA08435
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 1997 20:36:18 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA19455;
	Sat, 22 Feb 1997 18:48:14 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: kp_ keysyms don't bind
References: <199702230220.VAA18790@blight.IntraNet.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Jonathan Edwards's message of Sat, 22 Feb 1997 21:20:37 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 22 Feb 1997 18:48:12 -0800
Message-ID: <m2afowb5lf.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 20.1

Jonathan Edwards writes:

> In 19.15b95 keysyms of the form kp_0 are not being bound.
> global-set-key accepts them, but the kp_0 key does not in fact get
> bound (and is reported as the kp-0 key).

So far so good, this is intended.  The obsolete usage of
kp_... etc. has been replaced by the more compatible kp-... notation.
The underscore notation is accepted and silently converted to the
minus sign for backwards compatibility.

> This is incompatible with the way 19.14 and 20.x work. I reported
> this previously on b92.

Working differently than 20.x is a bug.  20.x should work exactly the
same way.

In what way does 20.x work differently?
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

