From xemacs-m  Wed Feb 19 20:13:15 1997
Received: from steadfast.teradyne.com (steadfast.teradyne.com [131.101.1.200])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA20938
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 20:13:15 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kiki.icd.teradyne.com (kiki.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.1.30]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id VAA09756 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 21:16:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely.icd.teradyne.com (spacely.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.10.9]) by kiki.icd.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id VAA27814 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 21:10:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely by spacely.icd.teradyne.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id VAA07197; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 21:13:11 -0500
Message-Id: <199702200213.VAA07197@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: deep weirdness in send_process and/or lstreams 
In-reply-to: ckd's message of 19 Feb 1997 20:51:26 -0500.
	     <w43eus1bz5.fsf@loiosh.kei.com> 
reply-to: acs@acm.org
X-Attribution: Vin
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 21:13:10 -0500
From: Vinnie Shelton  <shelton@icd.teradyne.com>

Steve,
    This sounds to me like the problem I saw (with Gnus) after David Byers 
made his changes to (was it?) event-stream.c.  I, too, had difficulty with 
posting.  This one doesn't feel like a bug in Gnus to me, either.

David, can you think of what might be going on here?

vin

> sb> == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
> 
>  sb> O.K.  This is probably a long-standing problem then.  Once long ago
>  sb> (before Gnus 5.0) I ran into something like this and tried
>  sb> unsuccessfully to convince Lars it was a problem with Gnus.  It
>  sb> doesn't happen when splitting and calling sendmail, it does happen
>  sb> when splitting a message for a multi-part post.
> 
> Right, but when calling sendmail you're not using a network socket (unless
> you're using smtpmail.el, I suppose).
> 
> There's nothing in the elisp that I can see that would cause it to hang.
> I don't think it's a bug in Gnus.
> 


