From xemacs-m  Tue Feb 18 20:49:11 1997
Received: from loiosh.kei.com (ckd@loiosh.kei.com [192.88.144.32])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA15265
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:49:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from ckd@localhost)
	by loiosh.kei.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA01852;
	Tue, 18 Feb 1997 21:48:08 -0500 (EST)
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: deep weirdness in send_process and/or lstreams
References: <w4ybcltxb7.fsf@loiosh.kei.com> <m2pvxxbls7.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Attribution: ckd
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Christopher Davis <ckd@loiosh.kei.com>
Date: 18 Feb 1997 21:48:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 18 Feb 1997 17:57:12 -0800
Message-ID: <w4wws5tst4.fsf@loiosh.kei.com>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.13/XEmacs 19.15

sb> == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>

 ckd> I just got bit by a weird one (19.15b94, BSD/OS 2.1, gcc 2.7.2).  I
 ckd> went to post an article and Gnus (5.4.13) just hung, completely--
 ckd> while posting the article.  Checking on the news server showed the
 ckd> article hadn't been posted and the server was waiting for the "dot
 ckd> on a line" to end it.

 sb> Try this: enable article splitting, set the split size to some low
 sb> number like 100 lines, and post something large enough to be split
 sb> into multiple parts to a local test group.

 sb> Does that hang too?

Good question.  Since the test article was only 76 lines, I doubt that's
gonna make a whole lot of difference.  Try <w4u3n969xj.fsf@loiosh.kei.com>
(but don't post it to ciwah :-).

It's not a "long article" problem (well, maybe it is, for a small enough
definition of "long article", but anyway...)

